Retirement guide
NPS vs PPF: which retirement plan wins?
Both are long-term, tax-friendly ways to build a retirement corpus. PPF is fixed and fully tax-free; NPS is market-linked with higher growth potential but an annuity catch. Here is the honest comparison.
Side by side
| Feature | NPS | PPF |
|---|---|---|
| Returns | Market-linked, ~9–11% | Fixed 7.1% (govt-set) |
| Risk | Low–moderate (you pick equity mix) | None (guaranteed) |
| Lock-in | Till age 60 | 15 years |
| Tax on invest | 80C + extra ₹50k (80CCD 1B) | 80C (up to ₹1.5L) |
| Tax at maturity | 60% tax-free; 40% annuity is taxed | Fully tax-free (EEE) |
| Liquidity | Limited partial withdrawals | Partial from year 7 |
A worked example: ₹1.5 lakh a year for 25 years
At its fixed 7.1%, PPF would grow to roughly ₹1.03 crore, fully tax-free. NPS at an assumed 10% would reach roughly ₹1.6 crore — but 40% must be annuitised, and the pension is taxable. Higher expected corpus, less flexibility.
When NPS wins
You want higher long-term growth, you are comfortable with market ups and downs, and you value that extra ₹50,000 tax deduction. Best for a long horizon (20+ years to 60).
When PPF wins
You want certainty, zero risk, and completely tax-free money you can access in a pinch (partial withdrawals from year 7). A great low-risk base for every portfolio.
Frequently asked
NPS returns assumed at 10% for illustration; actual returns vary. Rates as of FY 2025-26. Estimates for planning, not financial advice.